ENN - Electric News.net
Free e-mail alerts & newsletter - Sign up here
Free e-mail alerts & newsletter - Sign up here
Edit your alerts
News
   CORRECTIONS
Survey
Let us know how to make ENN better!
Take our reader's survey.
Post a Job

 
Students rebel against IT
Not so long ago students fought tooth and nail to get into IT courses. Now, they are shunning such studies, with massive implications for Ireland's reputation as a high-tech centre.
More here

 

::SECURITY

Multiple virus scanning needed, says GFI
Friday, August 02 2002
by The Register

Send story to a friend
Print this story
No single anti-virus product catches a comprehensive range of e-mail viruses and malware within a variety of compressed and uncompressed file formats.

That is the conclusion of a study analysing the results of research by five leading anti-virus testing laboratories from security firm GFI which reveals various (we'd say minor) shortcomings in popular AV products, writes John Leyden.

GFI looked at results on tests on AV tools from Trend Micro, Symantec (Norton), McAfee, Norman, and Softwin by five impartial anti-virus testing laboratories (ICSA Labs, West Coast Labs, Virus Bulletin, AV-Test.org, and Virus TestCenter). In GFI's analysis, particular attention was paid to overall virus detection rates, the ability of AV tools to scan through compressed and embedded files, and their coverage of non-virus malware.

Each product showed strengths in different areas, GFI concluded, so combining the capabilities of two or more products would let organisations make up for deficiencies in any single product.

Of course, this reasoning applies only if the products lack similar shortcomings and the firm's conclusion fails to take into account that the most pressing problem for most companies; dealing with either newly-created fast-spreading worms (like Nimda) or the steady trickle of old favourites, like SirCam and Klez. In the case of the former, best practice is moving towards filtering out suspicious e-mails at the gateway and/or employing heuristic detection/blocking at the ISP level.

For viruses like SirCam, all anti-virus software detects such bugs anyway and it becomes a problem of ensuring AV software is up to date. The reason viruses like Klez continue to spread is largely due to a complete absence of protection by consumers (mainly) rather than deficiencies in AV software as such.

That's not to knock GFI's study completely -- it does show up shortcomings in the ability of anti-virus tools to look within some uncommon file compression types for malware.

Using a battery of different scanning engines would be preferable but we question whether deploying products with single products with multiple scanning engines, such as GFI MailSecurity for Exchange/SMTP, is as important as the Maltese firm makes out. You can make up your own mind by reading GFI's White Paper on the company's Web site.

The Register and its contents are copyright 2002 Situation Publishing. Reprinted with permission.

:: Discuss this story - Click here

:: MORE NEWS from SECURITY

Search

Jobs
The 6th Sedona Conference in Dublin

UTVIP

Aztech

Powered by The CIA

 

© Copyright ElectricNews.Net Ltd 1999-2002.