The following e-mail will be sent on your behalf.

 has sent the following story to you from ElectricNews.net.

The story is available from https://electricnews.net/news.html?code=6330322

ICANN calls for major overhaul
Monday, February 25 2002
by Matthew Clark


ICANN in its current form has not become the effective steward of the global
Internet's naming and address allocation systems, admitted the ICANN president on
Sunday.

ICANN (The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers), the body that
presides over the Internet, has said that the Web in private hands has proven
unworkable. Subsequently, the organisation has called for a new structure that
will allow it to better fulfill its mission.



The current board of ICANN is composed of 19 directors with nine "At-Large"
directors, a president, as well as nine other directors selected by ICANN's three
supporting organisations. Five of the "At-Large" directors are selected
according to a vote of Internet users worldwide.



"The current structure of ICANN was widely recognised as an experiment when
created three years ago," noted board chairman Vint Cerf. "The rapid expansion
of and increasing global dependence on the Internet have made it clear that a new
structure is essential if ICANN is to fulfill its mission."



The new structure calls for governments to nominate one-third of a new 15-member
board with another third through a committee process and the rest consisting of
ICANN's president and appointments by four policy and technical groups.



"What has become clear to me and others is that a purely private organisation
will not work," said Stuart Lynn, ICANN president. Lynn's vision for the body is
one that is controlled in part by governments from around the globe with
participation of technical bodies and other organisations. 



ICANN has faced opposition from the first day it was established. In recent years
however much of this opposition has come from so called ccTLDs (country code top
level domains) who have refused to accept ICANN's authority as the principle
administrator of the Internet. Many ccTLDs have refused to pay dues -- or
donations, depending on one's point of view -- to ICANN as a result of these
disputes. 



In fact ICANN has cited a lack of appropriate funding as one of the main areas
that require attention. It is thought that more involvement from governments will
result in enhanced funding for the organisation. The body also calls for new fees
for some ICANN services. 



"The system is clearly not working now, so I welcome any change," said Ken
Sorrie co-founder for UK-based domain registrar Internetters. "Currently there
is a thought that ICANN is dominated by US interests. But what it needs is to be
more balanced with more participation from around the world and greater
uniformity." 



Whether the proposed restructuring will force greater co-operation between ccTLDs
and ICANN is uncertain. And despite the approval of the move by registrars, other
groups are sure to object to the proposed restructuring including privacy groups
and businesses who will now have to deal with an organisation that is partially
controlled by governments, and possibly heavily funded by them as well. 



"They (the reforms) will not appeal to those whose thinking is limited to
self-interest in a narrow sense," said Lynn. "They will be embraced, I hope,
by those who see their self-interest within the broader context of what is good
for the community as a whole."



ICANN's next public meetings are scheduled for March 10-14 in Accra, Ghana where
the issues are expected to be discussed further.